Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fitzgerald Brings New Legal Standard to D.C.
NewsMax.com ^ | Oct. 27, 2005 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 10/27/2005 2:20:13 PM PDT by Carl/NewsMax

For better or worse, Leakgate Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald has brought a new legal standard to Washington, D.C. - where he is said to be readying indictments against top White House officials based on false statements they made to investigators about a crime that may have never happened.

Though such a prosecution by Fitzgerald could certainly be legally justified, allegations similar to those currently under consideration for indictment - as well as other potential crimes that are far more serious - were seldom if ever prosecuted during the 1990s.

Here's a short list of potential criminal violations for which prosecutors decided not to file indictments during the Clinton administration.

• Lying under oath to a federal judge - a crime U.S. District Court Judge Susan Webber Wright determined that President Clinton committed in the Paula Jones sexual harasssment case. Legal resolution: No criminal indictment.

• Lying under oath to a federal grand jury - as Independent Counsel Ken Starr found President Clinton had done in the Monica Lewinsky investigation. Legal resolution: No criminal indictment.

• Lying under oath both to Congress and to federal investigators - as Independent Counsel Robert Ray concluded that Mrs. Clinton had done in the Travel Office probe. Legal resolution: No indictment

• Hiding evidence from Starr's Whitewater investigation - as the Senate Banking Committee concluded Mrs. Clinton did in the case of her missing Rose Law firm billing records. Legal resolution: No criminal referral, no indictments.

• Trading presidential pardons for finanical contributions - which President Clinton allegedly did in the Pardongate case. Legal resolution: No indictments.

• Trading presidential clemency for votes in a federal election - as President Clinton allegedly did with village elders in New Square, NY - which backed Mrs. Clinton's 2000 Senate candidacy 1400 to 12. Legal resolution: No indictments.

• Nuclear missile guidance technology allegedly traded by the Clinton adminsitration to China in exchange for campaign contributions. Legal resolution: No indictments.

• The Illegal gathering of confidential FBI files on political opponents - as the Clinton White House did in the Filegate case. Legal resolution: No indictments.

• Misusing the IRS to audit political opponents - as the White House allegedly did with numerous conservative organizations, as well as with witnesses against the Clintons. Legal resolution: No indictments.

• Hiring private detectives to intimidate and/or smear potential witnesses in the Starr investigation. Legal resolution: No indictments.

• Illegally leaking Linda Tripp's confidential personnel file to the press. Legal resolution: No indictments.

Too bad Patrick Fitzgerald was otherwise engaged when all of the above transpired.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: filegate; fitzgerald; indictments; travelgate; whitewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: MikeinIraq

Really? I guess I didn't realize he STILL retains executive priviledge after leaving office.


21 posted on 10/27/2005 2:39:43 PM PDT by SE Mom (God Bless those who serve..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000
"like it or not, dems get to play be a different set of rules. dont ask me why."

Because the media is nearly 100% in collusion with them. They share the same hatred for the United States.

22 posted on 10/27/2005 2:40:14 PM PDT by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

he does...

and actually I think it's the Senate that lifts it....

But a Presidential pardon would do the same.

Ford didn't have to pardon Nixon, if the Senate didn't go after him which was a 50/50 guess.

Of course had he not pardoned Nixon, we may never have had Carter as President, and then maybe no Reagan....

It would have been interesting...


If I am wrong someone please tell me....


23 posted on 10/27/2005 2:41:05 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (Pwner of Noobs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

What a crock. Republicans get indicted for things that the clinton administraton got a pass one, and there's not even any evidence to substantiate the Republican indictments, but there was lots of evidence to support the clinton admin indictments, and they never came. Typical liberal pass. I guess even a supposed fair minded guy like Fitzgerald feels the need to justify the time and money he's spent. If he indicts Rove and Libby and not miller, wilson, or plame that is proof of a liberal slanted investigation and jury, because the three of them are more obviously involved in wrongdoing than Rove or Libby have ever been. This is a crock!


24 posted on 10/27/2005 2:42:15 PM PDT by Allen H (Remember 9-11,God bless our military,Bush,& the USA! An informed person, is a conservative person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Actually, if Rove and/or Libby are indicted....their attorneys..and President Bush should just provide this list to the judge....case closed.


25 posted on 10/27/2005 2:45:42 PM PDT by Txsleuth (I am the real TXSLEUTH...please freepmail me if you doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MuchoMacho

How about a President's wife?


26 posted on 10/27/2005 2:46:20 PM PDT by Txsleuth (I am the real TXSLEUTH...please freepmail me if you doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The Senators who leaked classified information should be added to the list. Reid exposed raw data from FBI files (that he should not have seen). Kerry exposed something and I don't remember who spilt the beans on tracking Bin Laden from his cell phone. Can someone fill in the blanks.


27 posted on 10/27/2005 2:46:58 PM PDT by pieces of time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buffettfan

The Republicans sit around and take it because they have BB balls.


28 posted on 10/27/2005 2:48:09 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Allen H

Don't count your indictments just yet. Who knows where Fitzgerald has poked and prodded? All the reports in MSM are predicated on the assumption that, naturally, any correct-thinking person would be morally obligated to indict the Bushies.

But just suppose Fitzgerald is a decent, honorable man, as many claim him to be.

Well, in that case, Wilson and Plame might equally be the targets.

I'll concede there's no small amount of wishful thinking in this scenario, but once you strip the MSM bias and spin from what little they know officially, Wilson and Plame remain potential targets.

hey, but what do I know? I bet against the White Sox!


29 posted on 10/27/2005 2:48:23 PM PDT by Kiss Me Hardy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rushmom

Sure..Coulter WOULD say that....I guess she thinks that Miers and Bush are TOO STUPID to listen to Frist, when he says the votes won't be there...

OR Bush is so crooked, that he is using a "distraction"?


30 posted on 10/27/2005 2:48:37 PM PDT by Txsleuth (I am the real TXSLEUTH...please freepmail me if you doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Like someone else has said, everything the Democrats have been accusing the Republicans about, they have already done or are doing to this day, everything!


31 posted on 10/27/2005 2:54:18 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pieces of time

Unfortunately, the info about bin Laden's satellite phone came through prosecutor Duncan Fitzgerald (any relation?) in open court:

http://www.nationalreview.com/17dec01/bork121701.shtml


32 posted on 10/27/2005 2:54:40 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Oh,. my goodness....on Chrissy Matthews show....Norah O'Donnell is talking about the possibility that Rove/Libby could stay on staff even if indicted...

Her reasoning: There hasn't been a sitting official of the White House indicted since the Grant Administration...that they "offenders" resign...rather than being indicted while in employ of a POTUS...taking a chance of "tainting" the White House...

Chrissy asked Evan Thomas if he thought there was validity to O'Donnell's thoughts...Thomas said that "things are so loose" in the White House, "that probably NO ONE has told them that they need to resign....and that they probably will, either late tonight...or early in the morning, BEFORE the indictments come out"....

LOL...Matthews and his guests are totally baffled about why Rove and Libby haven't quit yet...they all have question marks above their heads....AND they seem very, very concerned that one or both might actually STAY until/unless proven guilty...........lol


33 posted on 10/27/2005 2:54:54 PM PDT by Txsleuth (I am the real TXSLEUTH...please freepmail me if you doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Isn't this a indictment of the ineptness Ken Starr more than anything else?


34 posted on 10/27/2005 2:55:09 PM PDT by tubebender (Chris Matthews suffers from "IRRATIONAL EXUBERANCE"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
no ,the grand jury hearings are being held in DC and the jury is made up 85 % black and demo. you can not convict a clinton of murder in that town !but being a republican is really a crime to this crowd!

the bushies were naive idiots !they did not clean house
during ashcrofts reign or in the cia or state dept .
they were set up by clinton holdovers.

that Fitzgerald knew the entire jury was all democrats !

they hold onto idiots like that scott mcceellon who
is awful !they need a nasty sharp tongue spokesperson
like that Pentagon guy who takes no prisoners !
35 posted on 10/27/2005 3:09:04 PM PDT by BurtSB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BurtSB

I have no doubt that you are right on...


36 posted on 10/27/2005 3:19:28 PM PDT by tubebender (Chris Matthews suffers from "IRRATIONAL EXUBERANCE"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
Everybody needs to sit tight and see what Fitz actually does. We just don't know. Therefore this is a bit preamature. You expect this of the liberal press, but not the Conservatives. "Hold fire to you see the whites of their eyes"

Agree completely - And I think I said exactly this within my first post - I think went on to give my take on the situation (with premising it with the fact that none of us actually KNOW what is going to happen).

37 posted on 10/27/2005 3:20:47 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
This is beginning to turn NIGHTMARISH! For now let's hold back our gun powder until we see those indictments! There's a lot of speculation going on and fear is beginning to take root! I hate the mediaWHORES!!
38 posted on 10/27/2005 3:23:20 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black


Fitzgerald is going to do the right thing,
in his eyes,and indict on perjury or obstruction.

He`ll do this to protect his reputation.

One thing he will not do is go after the real story.The CIA,Plame going after a sitting President.Using a willing dupe and fellow traveller (Joe Wilson) to plant a false story on Niger/Iraq yellowcake uranium and enticing the WH to entrap themselves trying to tell the truth.


39 posted on 10/27/2005 3:24:24 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kiss Me Hardy

I sure hope that's right. This stinks of another hit piece criminalization for being Conservative, like with DeLay. I mean, when Victoria Toensing who wrote the Intelligence Identities Protection Act comes out and flatly says that if Rove and Libby are indicted under it, or the 1914 espionage act it's a total abuse of their intended use, that kinda says it all. Especially since the whole point of this is the outing of valerie plame who any objective person would admit that Vanity Fare, the 1999 Who's Who list, her "SPY" liscense plate, and 2000 donation to Gore which said she's a Covert CIA agency, etc so on, pretty well outed her before Rove or Libby were even in a place to. This is nothing but a CROCK! 100%


40 posted on 10/27/2005 3:25:22 PM PDT by Allen H (Remember 9-11,God bless our military,Bush,& the USA! An informed person, is a conservative person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson