I don't think intentionally tried to mislead anyone about the current statements or recent actions the school board took in order to eliminate biases in favor of ID.
Whatever position one might take on the evolution v. ID debate, I think the dover school boarde has made an honest effort to be very fair to the evolution side while also pointing out that there are some who take an ID position.
In fact, I think the school board has gone much farther than required.
Because of the changes made in the policy, the statement of the school board, and the additions to the library, no one should be surprised if the defendants prevail in this case.
I can't think of any real issue raised by the plaintiffs that the school board has not fairly addressed the plaintiffs concerns.
The school board did not take the action of revising the statement and has not approved it. The school board is responsible for the introduction of ID in the first place.
And frankly, as far as the statement being amended to say "other resources" implying some donated anti-ID books as well as Pandas and People, the kids had better hurry up and read those anti-ID books before the janitor gets offended and burns THEM.