If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
Posted on 10/27/2005 9:07:26 AM PDT by Mia T
Is it possible that BJ Clinton is a woman hater who can not have normal sex?
He rapes or has dummies kneel before him.
>Condi Rice is the only one who can unite the conservatives.
Nobody can unite conservatives......
Thanks for the ping!
If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
You're a blessing Mia T, keep up the GREAT work!
The media is flossing it's teeth reading for President Hillary..
Look at this article, the gushing is so frantic,
that'd you think Hillary has a movie coming out,
or something to sell!
Oh yeah, ..how could we forget,
Hillary's selling herself,
and her minions are helping ready the masses
for her climb-in-power!
http://www.thejournalnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051030/NEWS02/510300318/1026/NEWS10
"And after seeing Condi Rice box it out with Boxer last week, maybe I've seen 'the right woman'. Condi's comments were informational and Boxer's were junk!"
When did this happen and where were they? I'd like to see or hear it.
I am sorry to disappoint your excitement about having Condi win the Presidency, but if it between Hillary and Condi, Hillary will win because all the conservatives will stay home. They will not have an Abortion rights person in the White House even if it means losing an election. The conservatives think this issue is too important to ignore.
I think my request was on Condi and Boxer's meeting last week. Do you have that?
That was a month ago on C-SPAN - you know - where the dems think they have to drill the Republicans. Ms. Rice held her own as she would on any program. That's the best I can do for ya!!
O'Reilly's pandering to hillary clinton almost three years ago....Looks like O'Reilly has finally, in '05, dispensed with access journalism insofar as missus clinton is concerned.
He's at long last concluded what was manifestly evident from the get-go:
The dud will never visit The Factor in his lifetime....
hillary's head revisited: hillary clinton, by contrast, subsists on cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind... In her new book, Political Fictions, Joan Didion indicts the fakery of access journalism practiced by vacant politicos like the clintons, whom she sees as "purveyors of fables of their own making, or worse, fables conceived by political strategists with designs on votes, not news." (More Didion: "No one who ever passed through an American public high school could have watched William Jefferson Clinton running for office in 1992 and failed to recognize the familiar predatory sexuality of the provincial adolescent.")
hillary clinton's brain (such as it is)
he smartest woman in the world would relish "the raucous give and take of American democracy, " as Charles Kuralt once put it.
also:
HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue
for the birds
(THE INCOMPETENCE OF HILLARY CLINTON)
HILLARY IN AVIARY
Who in heaven's name is writing missus clinton's speeches?
A "handling the hillary dud factor" AFTERWORD
SCHEMA PINOCCHIO
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)
KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE
1st Feminist Prez Impeached
(clinton, pushed by the "smartest woman in the world," managed to impeach himself)
New York, New York -- if hillary can't make it there, she can't make it anywhere
the significance of missus clinton's gratuitous gerundial g-droppings
And what would you call hillary clinton? Chopped liver? (BTW: To imply they are equivalent on this issue is to betray your myopia.) By staying home, you are voting for missus clinton just as surely as if you put an 'x' next to her repulsive name. You would be playing right into the clintons' hand. To 'win' a national election, they must split the Right. A clinton can 'win' nationally only with a plurality. By staying home, by placing a de facto vote for hillary clinton, the intractable social conservative would effectively become the Ross Perot of 2008. I suppose one could argue that this protest vote would be legitimate during ordinary times (although the years 1992-2000 argue against even this qualified proposition). But these are not ordinary times. Post-9/11, we no longer have the luxury of time or circumstance to survive another clinton. Indeed, we may yet not survive the first one. We must protect the lives of all children, the born and the unborn, alike. There is no act more anti-life than voting for hillary clinton.
I am sorry to disappoint your excitement about having Condi win the Presidency, but if it between Hillary and Condi, Hillary will win because all the conservatives will stay home. They will not have an Abortion rights person in the White House even if it means losing an election. The conservatives think this issue is too important to ignore.--napscoordinator
IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
But if the G.O.P. nominee is indeed a Giulini or Rice-type, wouldn't those who actually gave this nominee their votes be responsible if HRC won the Oval Office?
Just to ensure this scenario doesn't occur, we'd better concentrate on getting folks to vote in the primaries and gen'l election for the true-conservative candidate.
I'll get some signs made up, and Mia, you can bake some sfrattis and honeycakes to give out to potential voters.
Together, we can make a difference! :^)
Whichever nominee prevails, it is a given that some faction won't be thrilled. What is critical in these perilous times is that we remain united against a clinton candidacy.
So no, I don't blame the primary voters.
.--- who is to blame?
At the risk of sounding like you know who: I don't bake sfrattis and honeycakes. ;)
It's no skin off their nose to use Spielberg or Geffen-type money to keep their machine oiled. They'll keep doing it without losing a night's wink.
Even if she can't win, per se, the both of them intend to make as much of their influence as possible count on the international as well as national stage. They'll claim they weren't able to get their message out for the Republicans' "crazed, corrupt, screaming cacaphony" (referring, if they should ever be forced to, to such output as Mia T's (love ya, keep it coming!)) as they pose for world-reining "two-fer." They seek not so much "her" victory as a reprise of his camp's "style and charm".
They long for the day that UN types will acquiesce to an emotional wave of (corrupt) global representative acclamation to raise BJ to World Emperor.
They have literally billions available to expend and dozens of issues to demagogue toward that goal. Heck, the Bob Shrums on the dim side of the aisle are all lined up.
I predict, however, that the Grim Reaper will exploit trashed, self-inflicted bad health to bring it all to a screeching halt, and show the Kurintong age to have been mostly wasted folly.
HF
|
Hannity's s.o.p. is to pull back so as not to finish off his guest: Access journalism at its most basic. ;) It's a balancing act. And it's a shame he has to do it. Hannity has done some groundbreaking stuff. He was instrumental in debunking in real time the potentially devastating, ruthless exit-poll scheme of the Ds. And in this interview, he did expose missus clinton's active role in the rape and victimization of Juanita Broaddrick. If, to borrow from Bull Durham, media build an access-journalism-free field, the politicians will come. The politicians need the media more than the media need the politicians. |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
