Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exxon Mobil posts nearly $10 bln profit on record oil
Reuters ^ | Thu Oct 27, 2005

Posted on 10/27/2005 7:19:19 AM PDT by sumocide

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: sumocide

When the price of ____ goes up ____, then those who sell ____ will reap greater profits.


21 posted on 10/27/2005 1:42:00 PM PDT by Sometimes A River (No more crony picks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Still, like a millionaire who won the lottery, Exxon is almost embarrassed by how much money it is making. The company took out full page ads in newspapers, saying its profit is not out of line with other industries.

Exxon Mobil reported earnings of $9.9 billion, $1.58 per share, up 75% from the same quarter a year ago. The profit is more than what Microsoft reported in first-quarter sales after the bell today. Put it another way. The company earned $4.48 million an hour in profit during the quarter.

Big Oil: We don't need no more stinking refineries. We like the few that we have JUST FINE!

22 posted on 10/27/2005 1:56:54 PM PDT by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sumocide

These obscene profits are the equivalent of an 8.4% return per share. Ghastly horrid greedy. NOT.


23 posted on 10/27/2005 2:01:51 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sumocide

Exxon will use the profit to invest in more oil and natural gas development, and to upgrade refineries. That's their business, and that is what they do. Do we want to take the profits, call them windfall, and not have them available to develop petroleum resources? Is Hillary series about crippling the industry and giving us real oil problems?


24 posted on 10/27/2005 2:05:27 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

If I made only an 8.4 % return on my work, i'd get fired!


25 posted on 10/27/2005 2:06:54 PM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (If you want to be on my Civil Engineer ping list, just say so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

Your cute little statement makes no sense.


26 posted on 10/27/2005 2:10:32 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Never been accused of being cute, you trying to get close?????


27 posted on 10/27/2005 2:13:43 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

Send pictures and I will get back to you.


28 posted on 10/27/2005 2:16:51 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

I thot so, just talk....


29 posted on 10/27/2005 2:17:41 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

Back to your point. Even if the supply is controlled by a monopoly that does not mean it can control demand. And there are hundreds of independent producers of oil with thousands of small wells throughout the country. These are not always in operation depending on whether the price is high enough to justify pumping.

In any case the barriers to entry posed by governmental regulation work to the benefit of the larger companies.


30 posted on 10/27/2005 2:34:18 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
In most areas of commerce, supply and demand are in control.

However we are not speaking of widgets, we are speaking of the life blood of the world, in particular the United States.

Supply and demand keeps the widget makers in line. However oil affects everyone, immediately.

This fact allows a handful of people around the world to manipulate the market, thus supply and demand is skewed in their favor.

31 posted on 10/27/2005 2:48:25 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

Still makes no sense.

Supply is controlled by producers (and governments) demand is controlled by consumers. Last month saw the greatest drop in consumer demand on record.

Contrary to popular opinion even demand for oil is subject to price elasticity.

There have always been relatively large corporations in the world economy. Before oil you had the East India Company, Railroad barons, Financiers with great power, Astor, the Rothschields, the Medici bankers, the Fuggers.


32 posted on 10/27/2005 3:03:40 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

I'm pretty sure the chart shows the split-adjusted price, so you shouldn't multiply the number of shares.


33 posted on 10/27/2005 3:09:56 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent (I am a leaf on the wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
John D. had a stranglehold on oil. T. Roosevelt, saw a need to bust the oil industry. Now most of Rockefeller's business is back one group.

Oil is so vital to world economy that a few cannot be allowed to determine "supply".

34 posted on 10/27/2005 3:12:04 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
This fact allows a handful of people around the world to manipulate the market, thus supply and demand is skewed in their favor.

If they have that much power, why hasn't gas always been $5/gallon?

35 posted on 10/27/2005 3:12:09 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent (I am a leaf on the wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sumocide

Hooray for Exxon Mobile! F-ck Bill O'Reilly (not even my neighbor's dog would want to).


36 posted on 10/27/2005 3:14:40 PM PDT by Clemenza (Gentlemen, Behold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
Thats a good question. If that were tried the world economy would crash and the oil companies would be killing the golden goose.

Oil people well know what their limits are, overdo it and they will be taken over by government.

37 posted on 10/27/2005 3:16:28 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent

Then why wouldn't the value double at each split?


38 posted on 10/27/2005 5:33:12 PM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (Why is it you never hear "gender equality" mentioned in a divorce court?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

You and i mostly seem to disagree on stuff. Not here tonight.


39 posted on 10/27/2005 5:35:09 PM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (Why is it you never hear "gender equality" mentioned in a divorce court?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

See #12.

You raise a good point. With those kind of profits what exactly is big oil's impetus for building new refineries?


40 posted on 10/27/2005 6:36:45 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson