[MEGoody]

No, I'm not, but I was good enough to see that the argument to which I responded could only rest on a presumption of Bush's infallibility.

Please post any comment I made which implied that Bush was infallible.

I won't hold my breath waiting for a response to that question.

[dsc]

Here's the original exchange:

""Obviously, Bush did not think nominating Miers was the wrong thing to do. You might, I might, but obviously, he didn't.""

"So, is he infallible?"

No, you didn't intend to imply that Bush was infallible, however, if Bush is not infallible, then challenges to his decisions are allowable. The only grounds for requiring people to refrain from challenging his decisions would be infallibility.