Replies

I am not criticizing their income potential or method, power to them. I wish I could do what he does.

I am a Rush listener but have seen over the last few years a more grandiose format evolving. I like the energy he gives, but the extreme moments of ranting I can do without. It puts him on the level of Franken or some other emotional talking head. We win through constant and firm pressure and the truth as not delivered by MSM. Rush is like my opinion of the President, I disagree with what he says sometimes but still listen from 11-2 when I can, but he should do the same. The office has a certain amount of respect that Slick Willy dealt away, but GW has brought back. Disagree or not, but do not go on the air or in writing and criticize him by calling him uninformed, losing touch with his base, or accusing him of cronyism etc... for doing what he was elected to do. That just weakens the foundation he works from.

I feel that Rush and Ann probably voted for him so evidently they had some level of "trust" as well. If they helped elect him and felt that they had some individual influence over him more so than any other American than shame on them.

As for Ann I have never liked her or her opinions. Getting pies thrown at you does not equate with risking getting out into the political arena and letting the voters, not the advertising execs and consumer trends decide on your platform stance. When I hear her come on I turn the volume down because I can guarantee she will start yelling right after the introduction and I do not value her opinion anyway.

"Disagree or not, but do not go on the air or in writing and criticize him by calling him uninformed, losing touch with his base, or accusing him of cronyism etc... for doing what he was elected to do. That just weakens the foundation he works from."

Then you appear to prefer a monarchy, where no one can criticize the king. I would assume then that you are a Bushbot, whatever Bush says or does you will go along with, and never disagree in any public forum with him. Just like people do in dictatorships. Whisper amongst themselves, but never publicly disagree.

"If they helped elect him and felt that they had some individual influence over him more so than any other American than shame on them."

More Bushbot talk. Why would you think they feel they have any more individual influence over him than you or I? You are making an assumption with no basis in fact. Howwever, frankly if I thought my ideas could have some influence over him, I'd go for it, just as Ann would or Rush would. We all think we've got good advice to give.

"Getting pies thrown at you does not equate with risking getting out into the political arena and letting the voters, not the advertising execs and consumer trends decide on your platform stance."

Why to you presume to know what motivates Ann Coulter. Do you know her personally? Advertising execs and consumer trends? What in heavens name does that have to do with Ann Coulter? She risked getting into the political arena bigtime. What the heck are you doing, other than posting here? She's gone a lot farther in the political arena than most, and advocates continually for conservative causes.

"When I hear her come on I turn the volume down because I can guarantee she will start yelling right after the introduction and I do not value her opinion anyway."

Ann is not, and never has been a "yeller". In fact, too often, she is talked over by the opposing side. You obviously indeed do turn the volume down or the TV off when she comes on, because you haven't a clue how she presents herself when debating with the opposition. Yelling is not something Ann does and your ignorance of her shows when you state such. I'm beginning to think you are just one of those armchair Republicans who really never gets down in the nitty gritty of politics yourself, while opining about the virtues and vices of those that do.