To: B Knotts
Precisely! Make the big, bad, scary "Gang of 14" vote against the President. Over and over if necessary. Let's see how much they value their political careers. All of this jumping on chairs and shouting "Eeek!" at the mention of their names is ridiculous, to say they least. Nominate a true strict constructionist, Mr. President, Gang of 14 be damned.
838 posted on
10/27/2005 6:53:33 AM PDT by
Jokelahoma
(Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
To: Jokelahoma
Exactly. People are are so concerned about the moderates. I say nuke them.
If Repubs win in 2006, Specter, your chairmanship is toast.
If McCain has aspirations for Pres. well the GOP might forget to send the campaign $$$ you will need.
If moderates what to play hardball well the GOP has many ways to play back (Unless of course if the spines turn to mush).
886 posted on
10/27/2005 6:59:42 AM PDT by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
To: Jokelahoma
Let's see how much they value their political careers.Senate races have become much closer than House races in recent years (due to incumbent-protection districts). How many GOP senators do you want to lose before the Dems control the Senate again? Even if you have moderates like Chafee, Collins, and Snowe, they do mean the the GOP controls the Senate, and that means a lot of power over committee hearings, floor agenda, etc. It may not seem so recently, but returning the Senate to the Dems would really bollix the works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson