Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
A caller to Laura Ingraham's radio show just brought up a great point. Will President Bush now nominate a verifiable judicial conservative or will he be angry at "us" (the base that didn't support Miers) and start meeting with Chuck Schumer and whoever to get their insight on whom to nominate?

Just something to ponder..

592 posted on 10/27/2005 6:32:27 AM PDT by buckeyeblogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies ]


To: buckeyeblogger
Will President Bush now nominate a verifiable judicial conservative or will he be angry at "us" (the base that didn't support Miers) and start meeting with Chuck Schumer and whoever to get their insight on whom to nominate?

Let's hope all Congress critters up for re-election kindly advise him to do otherwise.

630 posted on 10/27/2005 6:35:48 AM PDT by workerbee (A person's a person no matter how small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 592 | View Replies ]

To: buckeyeblogger
A caller to Laura Ingraham's radio show just brought up a great point. Will President Bush now nominate a verifiable judicial conservative or will he be angry at "us" (the base that didn't support Miers) and start meeting with Chuck Schumer and whoever to get their insight on whom to nominate?

Just something to ponder..


Doubt it. I've been suspecting for about a week that this whole nomination was a red herring, and that's coming from a Miers supporter. I think Bush didn't expect to get her in, but knew that it would be harder for the dems to oppose two of his nominees. So he used a decoy to draw the worst of the dems fire. Once again, Bush is proving himself to be a master political operator. This time him and Rove outdid themselves so much that even many of Bush's supporters were fooled, to say nothing of his opponents. If that's true, then that's M4D politicking skillz.

I vote for Janice Rogers Brown or Priscilla Owen. And not because they're women. But because they're good justices.
655 posted on 10/27/2005 6:37:35 AM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 592 | View Replies ]

To: buckeyeblogger
Will President Bush now nominate a verifiable judicial conservative or will he be angry at "us" (the base that didn't support Miers) and start meeting with Chuck Schumer and whoever to get their insight on whom to nominate?

Just something to ponder..

Nothing to ponder at all...it really quite simple...if he's "angry at us", he and the Republican party can just be considered impotent till '08 and hurt in the wallet come election time in '06 and in '08. It would be an extremely DUMB move on his part.

697 posted on 10/27/2005 6:41:19 AM PDT by BureaucratusMaximus (The 2005 Chicago White Sox---World Series Champs---WOO! HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 592 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson