[adam_az]

" That is not how the hard working Evangelicals are going to see it. There has not been an Evangelical nominated to SCOTUS since 1930, and we do represent a large percentage of the population. Currently we have 4 Catholics on the court, and that does not go unnoticed. Finally, those who are committed Evangelicals and familiar with the churches of Christ/Christian Churches are going to laugh in your face at the mention of her being pro-choice or liberal."

What's your argument, that it's "your turn" to get a nominee of your particular faith to the SCOTUS? How about Jimmy Carter himself? This nominee was pretty much Carter in a dress. I could personally give a 'rats ass if the nominee is a druid, so long as they faithfully interpret the intentions of the authors of the constitution.

[GarySpFc]

What's your argument, that it's "your turn" to get a nominee of your particular faith to the SCOTUS? How about Jimmy Carter himself? This nominee was pretty much Carter in a dress. I could personally give a 'rats ass if the nominee is a druid, so long as they faithfully interpret the intentions of the authors of the constitution.

That is how you saw it. I am very well aware of which side of this debate you were on, and I am simply telling everyone how the hard core Evangelicals who are the workers are going to react.