Strawmen. The opposition was based on the total lack of constructionist credentials and the conflicts of interest inherent in the nomination. Everything else was tangential.
When you get honest with yourself, then we can talk. That may be what YOUR own opposition was based on, but others dissed her education, her looks, her intelligence, her career in corporate law, even -- as you can see on this very thread -- her sexuality. I have seen people on these threads call her a pig. I saved that particular post somewhere. I have to get to work now, but later will find that post and send it to you.
Then you can tell me again how the opposition was based only on her supposed lack of credentials.