Its been my observation that those networks that use unknown news readers for most of the news do a much better job than those that stick to the old dogs.
First, they have to at least attempt to be believable rather than simply making pronouncemts from on high.
Could be. Consider the talent coming out of the likes of the Columbia School of Journalism. Airheads would probably be a compliment. Likely steeped in Marxist idealogy moreso than their predecessors.
First, they have to at least attempt to be believable rather than simply making pronouncemts from on high.
I would take some issue with that. The "room" they are playing to doesn't care. Put them in the same class as the O.J. jury. All they want is something to hang their hat on. Doesn't matter if it's true or not, IMO.
FGS