Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RegulatorCountry

----- Huh? On the basis of our exchange on another Miers thread, I had the distinct impression that you were in favor of her nomination.

That was a quick change of heart. -----

You are probably misreading my position here, along with hers.

Her statement, if taken literally, means that if science can determine that it is a unique life (it is) then it is protected.


6 posted on 10/26/2005 7:17:41 PM PDT by Paloma_55 (Which part of "Common Sense" do you not understand???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Paloma_55

"You are probably misreading my position here, along with hers."

No, I don't think so. This little bit of pro-abortion boilerplate ...

"Legislating religion or morality we gave up on a long time ago"

... which preceded Miers' murky statement regarding science, religion and the appropriateness of not acting under the law, makes her position rather less than stellar, from a pro-life point of view.


7 posted on 10/26/2005 7:22:09 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry (Esse Quam Videre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Paloma_55

However her words may be technically interpreted, they mirror the rhetoric of the pro-choice movement (particular the first quotation about "the freedom of the individual woman's...) Anyway, the problem isn't that she's certainly not conservative, the problem is that she MAY not be conservative, and we can't risk a maybe on this.


13 posted on 10/26/2005 7:28:00 PM PDT by marsh_of_mists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson