Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aceintx

Bush would have more support if he would fight back against the libs, but for some reason he doesn't mind being a punching bag.


6 posted on 10/26/2005 3:43:32 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Peace Begins in the Womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Chandler

Those are my feelings, exactly. I had someone from the RNC call me, for a donation ,and I went off on him about the way the Republicans always want to play NICE. He didn't have much of a comeback.

As much as I am losing patience with this whole administration I'll certainly NEVER vote for a Democrat!

First on my agenda would be to can Scott (deer-in-the-headlights) Mc Clellan. I want to scream every time I see him ,lamely try, to defend his bosses. The word that comes to mind is WUSS! You have to admit, Clinton's spokesperson(whose name escapes me) was terrific. A liar but good at what he did.


23 posted on 10/26/2005 4:04:47 PM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler
Bush would have more support if he would fight back against the libs, but for some reason he doesn't mind being a punching bag.

EXACTLY

He ain't a political fighter

If he was he would have cleared out all the Clinton left overs who have done nothing but screw him
Sandy Berger wouldn't have gotten a wrist slap
Teddy wouldn't have gotten popcorn
He would have DEMANDED something be done about the forged National Guard Memo

ETC ETC ETC
38 posted on 10/26/2005 4:44:39 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson