Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
http://www.iwf.org/articles/article_detail.asp?ArticleID=832

That was an interesting read from the Independent Women's Forum. When Miers was first nominated, they endorsed her. After reading the article, I checked out the rest of their website. Looks like the endorsement has quietly been removed.

55 posted on 10/26/2005 11:00:19 PM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: freespirited; flashbunny; Stellar Dendrite
It would appear so.

IWF Statement Regarding the Nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court

10/17/2005

The Independent Women's Forum released the following statement regarding the nomination of Harriet Miers to the U.S. Supreme Court:

"Since the President nominated Harriet Miers to the U.S. Supreme Court, there has been much discussion about her qualifications and background. We look forward to the upcoming hearings, during which she will have an opportunity to provide more information about her judicial philosophy and qualifications for this important position."

Charlotte Allen's defensive statement in support of Miers-which had occupied a pretty prominent spot on their corresponding weblog, i.e. the IWF Inkwell, is nowhere to be found.

Instead, we get the aforementioned (ambiguous) statement located at the bottom of the page.

MIER'S REMORSE???

57 posted on 10/26/2005 11:36:46 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson