To: sinkspur
It's a shame you didn't read the parts of those reports that said neighbors were not being interviewed for the first time. Or maybe you did read them, but chose not to remember them because they are inconvenient.
117 posted on
10/26/2005 1:25:06 PM PDT by
lugsoul
To: lugsoul
It's a shame you didn't read the parts of those reports that said neighbors were not being interviewed for the first time.I did. Did he send the FBI back a second time to ask "Well, did you really, really, really not know where Valerie Plame worked?"
I don't think much of this investigation. It looks to be Martha Stewart redux: a gotcha prosecution.
119 posted on
10/26/2005 1:28:36 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
To: lugsoul
"It's a shame you didn't read the parts of those reports that said neighbors were not being interviewed for the first time. Or maybe you did read them, but chose not to remember them because they are inconvenient."
Randomly interviewing neighbors seems kind of a silly approach. In today's world, neighbors often don't know squat about what their neighbors do for a living. It would be more pertinent to questions friends and associates and reporters. Fitz should have subpoened the reporters who were making claims that they heard about Plame before this story broke.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson