Skip to comments.
Focus of Prosecutor in CIA Leak Inquiry Appears to Shift to Rove
AP via Yahoo! ^
| Tom Hamburger, Richard B. Schmitt and Peter Wallsten
Posted on 10/26/2005 6:02:43 AM PDT by Brilliant
WASHINGTON Prosecutors investigating the leak of a CIA officer's identity returned their attention to White House advisor Karl Rove on Tuesday, questioning a former West Wing colleague about contacts Rove had with reporters in the days leading to the naming of the covert operative.
Special Prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald also dispatched FBI agents this week to the CIA officer's neighborhood in Washington, asking neighbors whether they had been aware before her name appeared in a syndicated column that the operative, Valerie Plame, worked for the CIA...
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cheney; cia; fitzgerald; leak; libby; plame; rove; wilson; yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Since it appears that there is now no dispute that the "leak" was not itself illegal, the only reason I can think of that the knowledge of the neighbors would be relevant is if the prosecutor were trying to determine whether testimony by Plame and/or Wilson was truthful. If they told the grand jury that her status was a big secret, but their neighbors knew about it, then I think that might implicate them in trying to mislead the investigators.
1
posted on
10/26/2005 6:02:44 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: Brilliant
It takes three people to write this crap?
2
posted on
10/26/2005 6:03:55 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(The name "cyborg" to me means complete love and incredible fun. I'm filled with joy.)
To: Brilliant
How crazy is it that an investigation about a leak is seemingly being leaked around town by those responsible for prosecuting leaks?
3
posted on
10/26/2005 6:05:08 AM PDT
by
Dansong
To: Brilliant
I don't understand going to neighbors and asking them this asinine question. Gee, what's the chance they are libs?
4
posted on
10/26/2005 6:07:16 AM PDT
by
satchmodog9
(Free choice is not what it seems)
To: Brilliant
I wonder if these reporters give themselves wipelash with all the back and forth reporting
It's Rove
No .. It' Libby
It's Rove
No .. It's Cheney
It's Rove
No ... It's Bush
It's Rove
5
posted on
10/26/2005 6:07:46 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Brilliant
I still cannot see how you can expose a covert operative if he or she is not covert. Be like me saying that so and so works down at Wal-Mart and being hung out to dry for it. Am I missing something here or not?
6
posted on
10/26/2005 6:08:06 AM PDT
by
Piquaboy
(22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
To: Piquaboy
I still cannot see how you can expose a covert operative if he or she is not covertLiberals still maintain that she was covert.
7
posted on
10/26/2005 6:10:35 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: satchmodog9
If I were the prosecutor and Wilson and Plame testified to the grand jury that it was a big secret that she worked for the CIA, I'd want to find out if that were true. If not, it's perjury.
8
posted on
10/26/2005 6:10:45 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: Piquaboy
Am I missing something here or not?
If you're not paying close attention you're missing a political lynching. That's all though. There's nothing of substance here.
9
posted on
10/26/2005 6:11:46 AM PDT
by
saganite
(The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
To: saganite
You got that right in spades! Opps! guess that was not PC.
10
posted on
10/26/2005 6:14:12 AM PDT
by
Piquaboy
(22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
To: Brilliant
I'm confused...they are now going to the average guy on the street....
Is it the focus of the prosecution??
Or the focus of the persecution???
11
posted on
10/26/2005 6:14:17 AM PDT
by
God luvs America
(When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
To: Brilliant
With indictments due within days or even hours, isn't it a bit late to be sending out agents to interview the neighbors?
12
posted on
10/26/2005 6:15:11 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(It is Watergate yet? Is it Watergate yet?)
To: rhombus
Yeah! And I was undercover last night also.
13
posted on
10/26/2005 6:15:25 AM PDT
by
Piquaboy
(22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
To: Brilliant
Tom Hamburger" Deadline come on boy"
Richard B. Schmitt "Let's see, what kind of crap we can make up today"
Peter Wallsten "Hey, we'll put out bogus Rove story today"
14
posted on
10/26/2005 6:15:43 AM PDT
by
Rodm
(Seest thou a man diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings)
To: Brilliant
If Fitzgerald wants to know the truth about Rove/Libby/ Cheney/Bush/Wilson/Plame, et al, he needs to make sure that he questions the janitors and the garbage men who collect their trash.
If not, he's missing the REAL answers to who leaked what to whom and blah, blah, blah.
/sarcasm
15
posted on
10/26/2005 6:15:54 AM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Brilliant
If these "leaks" are true they are acting like Keystone Cops. They keep shifting focus to someone else. They have had 2 years to probe. One minute it's Cheney, one minute it's Rove and then Libby. The more the inquiry moves the more I'm convinced they have nothing
To: Brilliant
17
posted on
10/26/2005 6:18:42 AM PDT
by
petercooper
(The Republican Party: We Suck Less.)
To: rhombus
Shouldn't this have been the FIRST investigation that the special prosecuter would have wanted to have done?
Two years into the probe, and days before the grand jury is going to expire, the brilliant prosecuter, says, "Hey, let's find out if the neighbors knew about Valerie". "Was she really covert?" How did she get to work at Langley, in calypso louie's space ship?
This is just bullship.
18
posted on
10/26/2005 6:18:53 AM PDT
by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
To: Dansong
So much for the vaunted public employee, charged with public trust mantra.
He and his DC media friends are obviously making this a partisan farce of an "investigation".
A so-called natl security leak that was soooooo illegal that it was leaked to dozens?
Sure.
But it looks like this civil cold war is heating up.
To: DustyMoment
I think there is as many hints that Wilson will be indicted as there are that Libby will be indicted. But the media is fixated over Libby and Rove.
They seem to forget that at this point, the prosecutor is focusing on whether the grand jury was misled. That could implicate anyone who testified.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson