Next phase of the homosexual agenda - rid the world of "couples". They've destroyed so many good English words by their deceiptful lifestyle - "gay" used to mean fun loving, "rainbow" used to be a symbol from God that He would never inlict another flood ... now "couple" must be banished, according to their agenda. Where does it end?
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
I once emailed Camile Paglia and asked her her thoughts on why homosexual men, who supposedly were not attracted to women, went ga-ga over men who looked like women (both in their natural state and those in drag). And why the drag queen who could most exaggerate feminine traits was considered the most attractive by homosexual men (who supposedly weren't attracted to women)?
At the same time, lesbian couples also often clearly have one playing the male and one playing the female role. Not only in appearance, but in multiple dimensions of their relationship.
I asked her if this suggested that homosexuality was a coping mechanism for some inability to be in a heterosexual relationship, even to the point of recreating heterosexual dynamics in same sex couples.
I also wondered if, anthropologically and sociologically speaking, she thought maybe this (homosexual couples recreating the male and female relationship dynamics, even down to outward appearances, in their relationships) suggested a male/female relationship was the natural norm--even like a relationship "set point" that human biology consistently strives to attain.
She replied in her column with some meandering answer about homosexual men and ignored the questions about lesbians altogether.
I WANT MY REPARATIONS!
("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")
So instead, they embtrace “copulism.”
This analysis is way to deep, and I think could be used to take peoples eye off the ball (like many other political issues) All people need to understand is "gay marriage" is bad - Not take sides in some gay civil war.