[threeleftsmakearight]

If Bush knew there were no WMDs and he lied and said there were just to take us to war for political gain, wouldn't he know that he would be found out?
Why not wait to start the war closer to election time? This way the fact there were no WMDs would not come out until after the election.
Why not just have Rove plant the WMDs over there?

[Richard Axtell]

Frankly, the easiest way to debunk this stale, stupid lie, is to think just a bit further: If Bush lied about WMD's and we didn't know one way or another, what did and is stopping Bush and his government lackeys from lying NOW? They could announce all kinds of phony finds, and substitute very convincing chemical and biological arms for proof. But, if he initially lied, he would have continued to lie, he would have had to, like someone else we know... like... oh, maybe... BILL CLINTON?