Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice
The Egyptian pyramid age started about twice as long ago as that of Teotihuacan. Angkor Wat isn't even one thousand years old. How do you get "at the same time" out of that?
19 posted on 10/26/2005 8:11:39 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
Not arguing here, just trying to add more information. The pyramids at Caral, Peru date to about 2,700 B.C. I think the great pyramid at the Olmec ceremonial center at La Venta dates to about 1,500 B.C.

Archaeologists pretty generally agree the Olmecs were the foundational society for other Mesoamerican cultures including Teotihuacan and the Maya. There are definite proofs of Mayan contact with Teotihuacan. Contacts from Mesoamerica to places further south in Peru, etc. seem a given to me but I don't have any links.

Someone brought up the Roman arch. It's hard to know all the construction techniques of the Olmecs because they built mostly out of wood which hasn't survived. The Maya used the corbel-vaulted arch instead of a keystone arch, which allowed them to build solid-roofed buildings and burial chambers. Some scholars speculate there was nearly continuous evolution of the Olmec into the Mayan culture. There's still a whole lot of diggin' left to do down there.

21 posted on 10/26/2005 2:51:16 PM PDT by Bernard Marx (Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson