I was responding to someone who said that Borks opinion of Myers should be discounted because he couldn't get himself on the SC himself, so I don't disagree with you one iota. We would live in quite a different country had he been confirmed.
"I was responding to someone who said that Borks opinion of Myers should be discounted because he couldn't get himself on the SC himself, so I don't disagree with you one iota."
Gotcha. That response was one of the prime examples of a really quite disturbing trend here where if the ideas can't be challenged, you simply discredit the speaker. Imagine, having to tear down Robert Bork to make your point.
(shakes head)