Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timeout

"We certainly are being led to thin Libby, at the least, will be indicted.

I'm beginning to think this might not be such a bad thing (follow me here!).

Like the Delay travesty, we'll have to go thru the MSM squeals of delight phase. But eventually, Libby's lawyers will get to cross examine"

One difference if that Delay's district in Texas will likely re-elect him indefinitely whereas the President has a finite three year window and before this Cheney probably could have had the Presidential nomination if he wanted it.


12 posted on 10/25/2005 7:14:27 AM PDT by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying a Libby indictment would be a good thing. I'm simply pointing out the (slim) silver lining. If Fitz folds up shop without releasing more information, the media will see that Wilson goes down in history as a mega-hero (books, movies, speaking tours will follow). I want to know the TRUTH and it may be that a court is the only place to get it. I also want the media humiliated for having embraced the guy.


15 posted on 10/25/2005 7:18:32 AM PDT by Timeout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB
Cheney doesn't want the presidency.

He has heart problems.

As vice-president he isn't under the stress of the ultimate responsibility. And if he is unavailable at a critical moment, the government can go on.

He may live to be ninety. But why should he - and the country - risk what might happen to him under the rigors of his own presidency?
20 posted on 10/25/2005 7:50:32 AM PDT by Cheburashka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson