Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oceanview

So? Cheney has security clearance to possess that info, and so does Libby. Conversation between the two of them does not constitute any prohibited disclosure, unless others without clearance were present or were shown the Libby's notes later.


35 posted on 10/24/2005 9:37:28 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: GSlob

it has no merit factually, unless Cheney testified under oath to the contrary. on the spin side, the media will spin any indictment of Libby into a "he lied to cover for Cheney".


36 posted on 10/24/2005 9:39:55 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson