[William Tell]

I'm not sure why you posted this to me. I don't see any comment by you.

I see two interesting items.

First the article suggests that there is a nefarious purpose in digging into the details of intelligence. This despite the fact that the article notes the "on-the-one-hand/on-the-other analyses handed up by the intelligence bureaucracy". An administration contemplating going to war has no business allowing intelligence analysts to have a monopoly on the facts.

The other interesting item is that Hannah's lawyer denied his client's involvement completely. He could have just said, "we have no comment regarding an ongoing investigation".

[kcvl]

You were just the last person to post. It wasn't meant as a reply to anything by you.

Sorry.