[Cautor]

The Moderator pulled this thread before because I used Frum's title and link (Are the Miers Supporters Obtuse) found here http://www.nationalreview.com/ and which was not repeated on the page with the story itself.

[BigSkyFreeper]

The Moderator pulled this thread before because I used Frum's title and link (Are the Miers Supporters Obtuse) found here http://www.nationalreview.com/ and which was not repeated on the page with the story itself.

No, that was your title, the real title is "Next Step".

[Cautor]

FYI

[peyton randolph]

To reiterate: Frum is a Canadian. He is pro-abortion. He is a no-talent @ss clown.

[ez]

So anti-Miers are elitists and pro-Miers are obtuse. Great debate.

[ez]

On the contrary, reversing 4 decades of bad jurisprudence will take very uncommon levels of courage, ability, integrity, and independence.

I expect Miers to be strong on courage and integrity, competant but not exceptional on ability, and somewhat lacking on independence.

All in all, 3 out of four stars.

[Stellar Dendrite]

ping

[Don'tMessWithTexas]

It seems that those that support Harriet can discern her philosphy from her politics or from her religion. Both approaches are terribly dangerous. In the end, the pro-Miers crowd is reduced to labeling the ant-Harriet crowd as Bush basers in some form or another.

An appeal to let the constitutional process by letting her go to hearings is valiant but unpersuasive to me. The outcry of conservatives about this nominee has done much to inform the Senate of this nominee. That is part of the advise and consent process. I

t has become clear after three weeks that Harriet is a dud. What are we going to discover from the hearings? They will be characterized by platitudes and bolierplate.

[MNJohnnie]

Are the Miers Supporters Obtuse?

OH MY, what a devestating argument. Calling your political foes NAMES! WOW. What a WIT! Could it be that the "obtuse" are the political pundits, with ZERO real world political experince, who use their personal grudge against a nominee as an excuse to"bork" her?

Might "obtuse" be a most apt description for a pundit that manages to be so woefully inept in his attack strategty that despite deluge of character assignations and guilt by accusation trial ballons, the pundit completely fails to draw even ONE Meida ravenous Senators (the people who actually get to vote on this matter) to support that his emotionally hysteric jihad?

[krunkygirl]

save

[Mo1]

I don't know how this all will end

But one thing I do know is that I will never forget the borking this women recieved

[TeleStraightShooter]

I see her nomination as a spearhead that will pierce the gang of 14's bridgehead allowing two dozen worthy justices to breakthrough NARAL "Right-to-Take-Life" line.