Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chrisg2001
TM: Show me one example of an intelligent being that isn't born from another intelligent being.
Chris: Is that your answer to my request for you to post a link to the "evidence" you allude to below? Forgive me if I'm underwhelmed.

Chris: If you want an example of a being born from a being less intelligent than they are, it happens at least 1/2 the time on average, for some definition of "intelligent". Or is there actually some meaningful pont you are trying to make?

Well yes, that is an example of evolution, i.e., change over time. What I wanted was an example of an inorganic forming into an organic. The distinction is not irrelevant unless you've preconceived that such is religious talk.

74 posted on 10/25/2005 2:26:49 AM PDT by ThirstyMan (hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: ThirstyMan

>> If you want an example of a being born from a being less intelligent than they are, it happens at least 1/2 the time on average, for some definition of "intelligent". Or is there actually some meaningful pont you are trying to make?

>Well yes, that is an example of evolution, i.e., change over time. What I wanted was an example of an inorganic forming into an organic. The distinction is not irrelevant unless you've preconceived that such is religious talk.

So, intelligent=organic, and I'm supposed to have figured that out from your question?

There are multiple natural ways for organic compounds to form for inorganic, and these scenarios can be replicated in a well equipped high school science lab. And if you don't beleive that any of these methods correspond to the early
earth, organic compounds have been found in multiple space-based sources, so they could have come from meteors or comets if not formed here.


84 posted on 10/25/2005 8:07:40 AM PDT by chrisg2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: ThirstyMan
What I wanted was an example of an inorganic forming into an organic. The distinction is not irrelevant unless you've preconceived that such is religious talk.

Since you ask. Friedrich Wöhler did exactly this in 1828.

[From the article]: " Until 1828, it was believed that organic substances could only be formed under the influence of the vital force in the bodies of animals and plants. Wöhler proved by the artificial preparation of urea from inorganic materials that this view was false."

94 posted on 10/25/2005 2:23:31 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson