[js1138]

What does an Intelligent Design scientist do with his observation?

Since his observation is a conclusion, he uses it to prove his premise.

[furball4paws]

I was kind of hoping to string this one along a little, but he seems to have caught on. Maybe I need subtlety lessons. Want to oblige?

I would have said "He says 'I don't understand - it cannot be explained - it must be intelligently designed - the designer is aliens or Grauch Marx or God (shhhhh) - packs up his science certificate from the diploma mill and goes to Wednesday evening prayer".

You have such a way with words!

[boatbums]

Has it ever occurred to you that since NONE of us was present to observe when "it" all began, all we have is conjecture? We are all operating by faith in some way. You choose to believe there is no Creator, therefore no meaning for life, no "higher power" to answer to at the end of your life. That is why you fight so hard for what even the staunchest supporters can still only call a theory and not fact. There is still no observable occurrence of a transmutation on record, anywhere, anytime.

[ThirstyMan]

furball: What does an Intelligent Design scientist do with his observation?
js1138: Since his observation is a conclusion, he uses it to prove his premise.

His observation is not just a conclusion it is a very possible explanation, albeit the implications of such are what drive materialists crazy.

Let me ask you:
Spontaneous generation or self formation from nothing without the aid of any intelligence, what kind of scientific observation is that?