Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tiredoflaundry
One unspoken aspect of that provision is that whoever has been blocking the report's release in private -- under seal -- would, if a petition is made to the Supreme Court, have to do so publicly.

Any word on what David Kendall will do next?

34 posted on 10/24/2005 4:09:59 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Mo1

I'm curious. :-)


36 posted on 10/24/2005 4:10:58 PM PDT by tiredoflaundry (Tampa Bay Area, East Pasco County)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Mo1


Editorial: It's past time to release findings on Cisneros

Web Posted: 10/10/2005 12:00 AM CDT

San Antonio Express-News


snip


David Barrett, the independent counsel who conducted the investigation, told the Daily News he is eager to resolve the legal impasse.

"The report was filed over a year ago, but there are still matters ... that have to be resolved by the judges before they decide when it can be published," he said.

The attorneys want allegations apparently involving officials other than Cisneros, that did not result in charges, stricken from the report, but the people deserve to see the unvarnished findings of the inquiry.

If the report is sanitized, it will mitigate the resolution that would bring closure to a process that has gone on too long.


41 posted on 10/24/2005 4:19:59 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson