Skip to comments.
BARRETT BREAKTHROUGH (Updated information)
The Corner ^
| 10.24.2005
| Byron York
Posted on 10/24/2005 3:32:10 PM PDT by Checkers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-118 next last
1
posted on
10/24/2005 3:32:11 PM PDT
by
Checkers
To: Checkers
2
posted on
10/24/2005 3:33:39 PM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
(Tampa Bay Area, East Pasco County)
To: Checkers
3
posted on
10/24/2005 3:34:12 PM PDT
by
Checkers
(I broke the dam.)
To: tiredoflaundry
4
posted on
10/24/2005 3:34:36 PM PDT
by
Checkers
(I broke the dam.)
To: Checkers
If congress has the whole thing then it's going to be public knowledge in about 45 seconds.
To: Mo1; radioproducer
6
posted on
10/24/2005 3:35:24 PM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
(Tampa Bay Area, East Pasco County)
To: Checkers
7
posted on
10/24/2005 3:35:43 PM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
"If congress has the whole thing then it's going to be public knowledge in about 45 seconds."
Works for me.
8
posted on
10/24/2005 3:37:47 PM PDT
by
Checkers
(I broke the dam.)
To: Checkers
One unspoken aspect of that provision is that whoever has been blocking the report's release in private -- under seal -- would, if a petition is made to the Supreme Court, have to do so publicly.I love this provision! Let's get a name out there ... and find out why they don't want the report released. (And let's figure out why Section V is being kept secret.)
9
posted on
10/24/2005 3:37:50 PM PDT
by
StevieB
To: Checkers
SHOW ME THE MONEY REPORT!
10
posted on
10/24/2005 3:38:43 PM PDT
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: lepton
WHICH Cisneros matter? The one that has been all over the news. The one that the Times has been covering for months in hopes of indictments. /sarcasm
To: StevieB
It won't be secret for long, especially if Rove and/or Libby are indicted. Did you hear that Slick and Hitlery! Payback is hell!
12
posted on
10/24/2005 3:42:04 PM PDT
by
moose2004
(You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
To: Checkers
To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
Only if it makes Republicans look bad. If a Republican were to leak the report, all we would hear from the media is how it was wrong to leak the report and that we need an investigation into the leak. Silence on the content of the report... Remember the Senate Foreign Relations and Judiciary memos that the media is still silent about?
14
posted on
10/24/2005 3:43:36 PM PDT
by
Sthitch
To: Peach
15
posted on
10/24/2005 3:46:55 PM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
To: Checkers
"One unspoken aspect of that provision is that whoever has been blocking the report's release in private -- under seal -- would, if a petition is made to the Supreme Court, have to do so publicly."
Who will be doing the Clintonistas dirty work this time?
To: Checkers
Well, well, well.
"Oh what a tangled web we weave..."
17
posted on
10/24/2005 3:50:18 PM PDT
by
SE Mom
(God Bless those who serve..)
To: SE Mom
18
posted on
10/24/2005 3:51:54 PM PDT
by
Checkers
(I broke the dam.)
To: mainepatsfan
if a petition is made to the Supreme Court, have to do so publicly." heh heh heh !
19
posted on
10/24/2005 3:52:28 PM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
(Tampa Bay Area, East Pasco County)
To: Checkers
Isn't that the definition of "Extended News"?
20
posted on
10/24/2005 3:53:07 PM PDT
by
ZGuy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-118 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson