Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sun
"Darwin has a crazy dream..."

That is really a possibility how the whole thing started. But then you made a mistake. It is the first step to a proper hypothesis to just look around and see if it fits to the facts you got.

"...and then he and other scientists try to back it up with 'evidence.' "
What will you do if you'll find a fact that would support the theory of evolution? Hide it in a dark corner?
The price for scientific fact disproving the theory of evolution would be noble.
154 posted on 10/31/2005 9:31:58 AM PST by MHalblaub (Tell me in four more years (No, I did not vote for Kerry))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: MHalblaub

Believing in evolution is not against my religion. God could have used evolution.

However, so far evolution is a silly theory that has not been proved.

The Evolution THEORY is only supported by more THEORIES.

Go figure.

In those days the cell was a black box, a mystery. But in the 20th century, scientists were able to open that black box and peek inside. There they found not a simple blob but a world of complex circuits, miniaturized motors, and digital code. We now know that even the simplest functional cell is almost unfathomably complex, containing at least 250 genes and their corresponding proteins.

Explains New Zealand geneticist Michael Denton, each cell “is in effect a veritable micro-miniaturized factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms.”

The odds of a primordial soup randomly burping up even one protein strand of moderate length are dramatically less than 1 chance in 10150.

It’s hard to grasp how long these odds are—one followed by 150 zeros. We know that a lot of strange things can happen in a place as big and old as our universe, but as mathematician and philosopher William Dembski explains in the Cambridge University Press book The Design Inference, the universe isn’t remotely big enough, old enough, or fast enough to generate that much complexity.

Nor have attempts to explain this complexity as the natural outworking of the laws of nature proven successful. The best explanation? INTELLIGENT DESIGN. (emphasis mine)

excerpt from http://www.discovery.org/scripts/vi...nd=view&id=2350


155 posted on 10/31/2005 7:59:18 PM PST by Sun (Hillary Clinton is pro-ILLEGAL immigration. Don't let her fool you. She has a D- /F immigr. rating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson