Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: frogjerk

I suspect this "un-named source" doesn't exist.


71 posted on 10/24/2005 1:54:48 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: ozzymandus

The Daily News deserves no better classification than "toilet tissue".


73 posted on 10/24/2005 1:56:41 PM PDT by clyde260 (Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: ozzymandus

It's the Daily Snooze.

It's circulation is plummeting daily.

I'm a New Yorker.

No one reads these rags anymore.

Plus, the ink gets all over your fingers when you read the Daily Snooze.

I hear liberals use old Daily News papers to make pom poms to hold pep rallys for terrorists.


75 posted on 10/24/2005 1:57:13 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: ozzymandus
"I suspect this "un-named source" doesn't exist."

I agree. This sounds like a quote that someone would make up to try and portray an equivalence between the way Clinton treated Starr and the way Bush is treating Fitz. There is no comparison whatsoever, and I think this reporter is trying to establish one with this made-up quote. As others have pointed out, this sounds like the stuff said about Starr and has no relationship to any actual information I've read about Fitz (moralistic/church-going etc).
79 posted on 10/24/2005 1:59:42 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson