To: frogjerk
I suspect this "un-named source" doesn't exist.
To: ozzymandus
The Daily News deserves no better classification than "toilet tissue".
73 posted on
10/24/2005 1:56:41 PM PDT by
clyde260
(Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
To: ozzymandus
It's the Daily Snooze.
It's circulation is plummeting daily.
I'm a New Yorker.
No one reads these rags anymore.
Plus, the ink gets all over your fingers when you read the Daily Snooze.
I hear liberals use old Daily News papers to make pom poms to hold pep rallys for terrorists.
75 posted on
10/24/2005 1:57:13 PM PDT by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: ozzymandus
"I suspect this "un-named source" doesn't exist."
I agree. This sounds like a quote that someone would make up to try and portray an equivalence between the way Clinton treated Starr and the way Bush is treating Fitz. There is no comparison whatsoever, and I think this reporter is trying to establish one with this made-up quote. As others have pointed out, this sounds like the stuff said about Starr and has no relationship to any actual information I've read about Fitz (moralistic/church-going etc).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson