Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kay
#1. You are dense if you don't know that answer. """

YOU'RE DENSE if you think I ever was part of the attack-Starr crowd. That's what Rushmon either ignorantly or deceitfully claimed -- without proof, because there is none. I wanted Clinton impeached and convicted. No censures, no wrist-slaps, no "Scottish law," Impeacment and conviction FOR LYING UNDER OATH.

If you think I'm now going to soft-pedal perjury, if it turns out that a Republican or two might have committed it, you don't know me or my commitment to rule of law.

108 posted on 10/24/2005 2:17:06 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: churchillbuff

IMO, your posts are heavily tilted towards the White House lying & obstructing. Perhaps I missed your posts where you posting the other possibilities. I can see why folks think that you are a troll.


111 posted on 10/24/2005 2:20:50 PM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
If you think I'm now going to soft-pedal perjury, if it turns out that a Republican or two might have committed it, you don't know me or my commitment to rule of law.

And if we do that, it will validate everything the Dems said about us during the Clinton years. Perjury is perjury, whether its a Democrat or Republican. The difference between us is that we take our trash out (Packwood, etc.), whereas they coddle theirs.

Let's just see what the charges actually are, and what the evidence is in support. Until that time, we really can't have informed opinions. There's no way I'm going to get caught up in "perjury is okay if you're trying to counter liberal lies" as a first line of defense.

143 posted on 10/24/2005 2:47:32 PM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
If you think I'm now going to soft-pedal perjury, if it turns out that a Republican or two might have committed it, you don't know me or my commitment to rule of law.

What rule of law do you believe that should ignore context? Does it matter to you that Wilson has been found to be a liar and misused the resources of this country to undermine an elected official at the time of war? Or do you think of him a patriotic whistle blower?

164 posted on 10/24/2005 3:05:33 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
You have principle. The people attacking you are the same people that screech to the heavens when a lib judge legislates from the bench but think it's perfectly alright when a conservative judge does the same.

Crats will lower themselves into the slime to gain or hold onto power, true Republican conservatives hold themselves to a higher standard.

191 posted on 10/24/2005 4:12:50 PM PDT by metalurgist (Death to the democrats! They're almost the same as communists, they just move a little slower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson