Skip to comments.
W pals bushwhack CIA leak prosecutor
New York Dailiy News ^
| Oct 24 05
| THOMAS M. DeFRANK and MICHAEL McAULIFF
Posted on 10/24/2005 1:16:10 PM PDT by churchillbuff
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-225 last
To: WinOne4TheGipper; Txsleuth
I just FRmailed her with the links.
Thank God. I haven't been hurt like that since I can't remember. Thank God it's not true.
221
posted on
10/24/2005 6:55:46 PM PDT
by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
To: tarheelswamprat
I don't disagree with anything you said. In fact, I'm just as surprised as you are at the naivety of W's administration in their preparation of the typical democrat & MSM critical onslaught.
One would think that W and his handlers would be much wiser and prepared for the dirtiest of inside the beltway ruthlessness than he's demonstrated. He and his administration get an "F" in my book for not only their handling of this bungled mess, but their limp wristed retaliation on their enemies.
222
posted on
10/24/2005 7:02:38 PM PDT
by
demkicker
(I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
To: FreedomSurge
A gross lie.Yup. And the entire basis for this moonbat fantasy.
To: montag813
Bush chose to appoint someone after they knew all of this. Why?
224
posted on
10/24/2005 7:25:50 PM PDT
by
dalight
To: Wild Irish Rogue; Alberta's Child
Well, if there were genuine leaks it would take time to track them down, Fitzgerald would have no idea at this time.
Alberta's Child has suggested that it is not illegal to leak falsehoods. It might be a stretch, but if Fitz is not coming out with indictments and lefties in his office know that, the best way to do damage is to suggest there will be prosecutions. When there aren't, Fitz looks weak and compromised and maybe they can gin up a new investigation.
225
posted on
10/25/2005 8:10:40 AM PDT
by
AmishDude
(If Miers isn't qualified, neither are you and you have no right to complain about any SC decision.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-225 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson