[L.N. Smithee]

Anyway, you asked, I answered.

No, you didn't. Here is what I wrote, in context:

---

Santorum was on the money regarding Lawrence, and caught hell for telling the truth before the verdict came down; this was designed for the purpose of clearing the way for a right to same-sex marriage, with potentially other outlawed forms of "marriage" (polygamy, incestuous, cross-species, even) to follow.

Is that what YOU prefer?

---

"Freedom from tyranny" is not an answer to that question.

[Paul C. Jesup]

I thought were two different statements within a post. To answer your question. It is a trick question considering the two options you offer is either conspiracy to commit a crime, or tyranny in the bedroom.

Neither of which I support.

[Paul C. Jesup]

I thought that those were two different statements within a post. To answer your question. It is a trick question considering the two options you offer is either conspiracy to commit a crime, or tyranny in the bedroom.

Neither of which I support.