Skip to comments.
Bush Won't Release All Miers Records
ap on Yahoo ^
| 10/24/05
| NEDRA PICKLER - ap
Posted on 10/24/2005 9:46:58 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
To: TAdams8591; Pharmboy; Das Outsider; meema; Texas Federalist; Rodney King; ARealMothersSonForever; ..
2
posted on
10/24/2005 9:49:13 AM PDT
by
flashbunny
(What is more important: Loyalty to principles, or loyalty to personalities?)
To: NormsRevenge
Senator Sam Brownback gets his wish. Let's see if he and Senator Lindsay Graham can win over the mainstream Republicans now.
3
posted on
10/24/2005 9:51:23 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
(I'm not schizophrenic, and neither am I...)
To: TommyDale; NormsRevenge
Why are they still using records anyway?
It's a CD world these days! At least move on to cassette tapes, for crying out loud!
;-)
4
posted on
10/24/2005 9:54:10 AM PDT
by
TitansAFC
("'C' is for 'cookie,' that's good enough for me" -- C. Monster)
To: NormsRevenge
President Bush said Monday that he will not release any records of his conversations with Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers that could threaten the confidentiality of the advice that presidents get from their lawyers. Nor should he. It means there's still no evidence that Miers is qualified for the Supreme Court, but them's the breaks.
5
posted on
10/24/2005 9:54:18 AM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
("She was appointed by a conservative. That ought to have been enough for us." -- NotBrilliant)
To: NormsRevenge
Democrats, too, have expressed concerns about whether Miers could sever her close ties to Bush and rule independently once on the bench.
--
Gee, did Bader Ginsburg cut her links and ideological followings of the ACLU when she assumed her seat?
and she got approved overwhelmingly as I recall.
6
posted on
10/24/2005 9:55:10 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: flashbunny
The choice has troubled some conservatives who say it was risky because Miers was a blank slate on issues such as abortion and gay rights.
Never mind that whole independence and judicial philosophy thingy. I'm outraged that she isn't far right. (/sarcasm)
Let's just go on talking about the proportional representation requirement of the Equal Protection Clause and the eligibility of Hobbits to serve on the Bakersfield city council.
7
posted on
10/24/2005 9:56:20 AM PDT
by
Das Outsider
(Bowling for Justices: The Musical)
To: flashbunny
This is his "Get Out of Jail Free" card on the Miers mess. He refuses to turn over the papers, the Senate insists, he "reluctantly" withdraws the nomination. Makes him look like he's "standing on principle," not turnin' tail and runnin'.
8
posted on
10/24/2005 9:58:27 AM PDT
by
Map Kernow
("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
To: NormsRevenge
This may be what will cause the death of this nomination, in particular if the some GOP Senators announce publicly that they will not vote for Miers if the White House does not provide the documents they want. Cheer up anti-Miers camp, you may have gotten your wish.
9
posted on
10/24/2005 9:59:00 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
To: NormsRevenge
"People can learn about Harriet Miers through hearings, but we are not going to destroy this business about people being able to walk into the Oval Office to say, Mr. President, this is my advice,"Not feeling very articulate today, are we Mr. Bush?
10
posted on
10/24/2005 10:00:13 AM PDT
by
Kjobs
To: Kjobs
Not feeling very articulate today, are we Mr. Bush?I understood him, didn't you?
11
posted on
10/24/2005 10:01:44 AM PDT
by
rhombus
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: Javelina
13
posted on
10/24/2005 10:02:46 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: NormsRevenge
This could be the exit strategy.
15
posted on
10/24/2005 10:03:22 AM PDT
by
Buck W.
(Yesterday's Intelligentsia are today's Irrelevantsia.)
To: Map Kernow
>>>"This is his "Get Out of Jail Free" card on the Miers mess. He refuses to turn over the papers, the Senate insists, he "reluctantly" withdraws the nomination. Makes him look like he's "standing on principle," not turnin' tail and runnin'."
Bump. Most sensible proposal I've seen yet. Saves face, gets Miers out of the way, GOP can heal things up, assuming someone qualified follows and Bush pushes strenuously and gets confirmation.
To: Javelina
So you would have voted for Ruth to sit on the SCOTUS?
So why not Miers, could she possibly be anymore injurious to the nation?
17
posted on
10/24/2005 10:11:33 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: NormsRevenge
"It's a red line I'm not willing to cross," Bush said.
Then why the heck did you nominate her?
Oh that's right, because you could.
18
posted on
10/24/2005 10:14:01 AM PDT
by
trubluolyguy
(How about them Seahawks!??!)
To: NormsRevenge
This is becoming a sick joke...
To: NormsRevenge
Release them (or whatever's left of them)! Incidentally, did you know that it was the mother of Monkee Michael Nesmith who invented Liquid Paper?
20
posted on
10/24/2005 10:17:30 AM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
("Harriet, we're out of Liquid Paper!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson