Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Smogger
No history of judging, writing about, even thinking about(!) issues in constitutional law.

Embarassing writing and argumentative ability ~~ 'the answer to society's problems is for everyone, young and old, rich and poor, male and female, tall and short, to commit themselves to solving society's problems' (slight paraphrase)

Essentially she doesn't have any experience dealing with constitutional law and has shown nothing which would suggest that she has a particular aptitude for it.

27 posted on 10/24/2005 11:44:36 AM PDT by JohnnyZ ("She was appointed by a conservative. That ought to have been enough for us." -- NotBrilliant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: JohnnyZ
No history of judging, writing about, even thinking about(!) issues in constitutional law.

She's not a judge, and how do you know what she has thought about?

I wasn't aware that being an expert in constitutional law was a prerequisite for being a supreme court justice. I am no expert on the Constitution, but I don't believe there are ANY qualifications to sit on the Supreme Court.

28 posted on 10/24/2005 1:38:31 PM PDT by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson