Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miers Plays Santa Claus to Lefty Lawyers
Chipstein ^ | 10/23/05 | evan gahr

Posted on 10/24/2005 9:27:05 AM PDT by freespirited

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
The full report alluded to in today's Washington Times (see earlier thread). IMO fully consistent with the view Miers expressed in her columns as Texas bar president--lawyers are the key to fixing what is wrong with society.
1 posted on 10/24/2005 9:27:07 AM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freespirited

IOLTA is one of the greatest shams the legal profession has pulled on the public, and I--an attorney--am willing to go on record by saying as much. If a cause is so noble and just, an attorney should take the case for free.


2 posted on 10/24/2005 9:30:44 AM PDT by hispanichoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591; Pharmboy; Das Outsider; meema; Texas Federalist; Rodney King; ARealMothersSonForever; ..
This doesn't matter.

What matters is that miers was an influential attorney and head of the Texas bar association. That means she has experience and legal 'gravitas'. She was in charge of a state bar association! That matters! She deserves credit for what she has done!

However, anything that was done by harriet miers during those years and makes her look bad should be ignored. She wasn't really 'in charge' of the Texas bar association. She was just passing along what other people wanted done. She can't be held responsible for what happened while she was there!
3 posted on 10/24/2005 9:34:27 AM PDT by flashbunny (What is more important: Loyalty to principles, or loyalty to personalities?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

"Harriet Miers has helped gay rights advocates and their ideological soul mates on the left get something more valuable than advice: cold hard cash."

Never had a hubby or kids, either.


4 posted on 10/24/2005 9:36:23 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
Never had a hubby or kids, either.

What, exactly, do you mean by that? A Texas Supreme court judge is on the record stating that they dated! /snark

5 posted on 10/24/2005 9:39:29 AM PDT by Peter vE (Ceterum censeo: delenda est Carthago.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Already savaged by conservatives for insufficient fealty to the cause

Missing the point. It isn't that she isn't far enough to the right; we're talking about qualifications to serve on the Supreme Court: a point that the Miers Mania crowd apparently overlooked.
6 posted on 10/24/2005 9:40:53 AM PDT by Das Outsider (Bowling for Justices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hispanichoosier
IOLTA is one of the greatest shams the legal profession has pulled on the public, and I--an attorney--am willing to go on record by saying as much. If a cause is so noble and just, an attorney should take the case for free.

It is difficult for me to see the difference between IOLTA and theft. The client does not give permission to have the interest on his funds appropriated by the bar. I am amazed that no one has made this an issue of this.

7 posted on 10/24/2005 9:44:40 AM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

"Never had a hubby or kids, either."

Relevance? Please be specific. Thanks.


8 posted on 10/24/2005 9:52:36 AM PDT by USPatriette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
It is difficult for me to see the difference between IOLTA and theft.

Well, the client can ask for his funds to be held apart from the IOLTA account. If I was a client, I might do so for religious reasons. The key is that too many clients don't know about IOLTA.
9 posted on 10/24/2005 9:56:02 AM PDT by hispanichoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
"Never had a hubby or kids, either."

Neither did I (it most assuredly isn't because I didn't want them) and I have been a conservative (probably all my life), at least since my college days when Reagan was first elected president.

I might remind you there are several outspoken and strongly conservative women who also have never been married and don' have children. Laura Ingrahm and Ann Coulter are the first two who come to mind. Peggy Noonan has a son though she never married.

Thus, your argument is meaningless.

There are a variety of other argments which are persuasive and effective.

10 posted on 10/24/2005 10:06:34 AM PDT by TAdams8591 (It's the Supreme Court, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
Good point.

If her experience as head of the Texas ABA reflects poorly upon her, it is ignored. If it reflects well, she gets the credit.

11 posted on 10/24/2005 10:09:35 AM PDT by TAdams8591 (It's the Supreme Court, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; Extremely Extreme Extremist; BigSkyFreeper; LS; Earthdweller
Some eight years later, Miers and her comrades on the "American BarAssociation Consortium on Legal services and the Public," joined up with Tulane Law School professors to sponsor the very ambitious sounding "National Conference on Access to Justice in the 1990s." No mere cog in the wheel, Miers also labored on a "planning subcommittee" for the New Orleans shin dig in June 1989.

According to the official 1991 ABA report, conference participants discussed a number of "fruitful funding theories" that would provide money to fund better legal services for the poor. These included a "dedicated gross receipts tax on lawyer's professional income" and the enactment of "comprehensive IOLTA programs, now implemented in 22 states, [in] the remaining jurisdictions."

12 posted on 10/24/2005 10:11:35 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
That was dripping with some much sarcasm that I had to grab a towel.
13 posted on 10/24/2005 10:12:58 AM PDT by deadrock (Isn't that KoolAid getting stale?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DEADROCK

some = so


14 posted on 10/24/2005 10:13:40 AM PDT by deadrock (Isn't that KoolAid getting stale?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
Never had a hubby or kids, either.

She may have met a guy like you at some point, and said "Never!"

15 posted on 10/24/2005 10:15:11 AM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; DEADROCK
What's Miers take on all this? In the only one of about 21,800 Miers that listed on news.google.com which links her to IOLTA, Jordan tells Fort Worth Star-Telegram reporter Max Baker "I don't know of any time in her career that she's opposed a valid, pro-bono program like Legal Services, IOLTA or the clinic approach."
16 posted on 10/24/2005 10:25:00 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

The main point of this thread is that Miers had a hand in organizing one of the sleaziest legal attacks on true justice that has ever been mounted in our country. And she has always moved in the kind of ABA circles that are responsible for these leftist attacks on our constitutional system of justice and equity.

She is proving to be a truly lousy candidate, maybe even worse than Souter.

There are only two ways to take this: either she is a leftist, or she is a brown noser who goes along with leftists to further her career.

Or there is a third way: She is both.


17 posted on 10/24/2005 10:26:45 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero; flashbunny; Stellar Dendrite
New slogan for the Harriet Miers campaign:

If you love those pinko lawyers at the Legal Services Corporations, then you'll love Harriet!

YAY, more funding for destructive, bleeding-heart liberal causes, YAY!

18 posted on 10/24/2005 10:34:16 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

>>>>She is proving to be a truly lousy candidate, maybe even worse than Souter.

She is definitely a worse candidate than Souter. It is beginning to appear that she would also be a worse judge. I'm getting less and less happy about her.

patent


19 posted on 10/24/2005 10:34:26 AM PDT by patent (A baby is God's opinion that life should go on. Carl Sandburg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

Take it easy now. I'm with you guys. Meirs is a disaster.


20 posted on 10/24/2005 10:35:10 AM PDT by deadrock (Isn't that KoolAid getting stale?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson