To: aceintx
Why can't we restrain our criticism of the Lady until she has had an opportunity to either make an ass of her critics or of her self before the Judiciary Committee?
That is the way the system is supposed to work, isn't it?
178 posted on
10/24/2005 10:47:51 AM PDT by
F.J. Mitchell
(How the hell could Bush have passed up a Ronnie Earle to appoint a Harriet Miers to the Court?)
To: F.J. Mitchell
Why can't we restrain our criticism of the Lady until she has had an opportunity to either make an ass of her critics or of her self before the Judiciary Committee?
That is the way the system is supposed to work, isn't it?
Because these questions that we are raising are serious questions. If we just keep our mouths shut do you really think there would be any opportunity of stopping her in committee??
As far as her making an ass of herself...it won't be her that she'll be making an ass of....have you stopped to consider the possibility that some of us care enough about this President to try and protect him from himself. If she goes before the committee and shows herself to be incompitent and unqualified...it will hurt us all far worse than my opposition!
189 posted on
10/24/2005 12:27:11 PM PDT by
aceintx
(Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
To: F.J. Mitchell
Actually, our system is predicated on vigorous public and political discourse. It's part of the process for citizens to exercise our God-given rights to free speech and make known our opinions about the actions of our government. That's what we're all doing here, on both sides of this issue -- and it's not just legitimate, but absolutely necessary.
205 posted on
10/24/2005 1:20:32 PM PDT by
ellery
(The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson