Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
Sure, I'll concede that. It would have fell even further had Reagan not raised taxes.

Thank you - so Reagan did hold true to his principles, government's role in the economic life of the nation did roll back. Compare and contrast to the increases in the Department of Education, Medicare, et al, from Bush - increases in defence spending were defensible, this is not - and to suggest that it shows an even greater adherence to conservative principle than Reagan is insane.

Ivan

67 posted on 10/24/2005 9:26:45 AM PDT by MadIvan (You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: MadIvan
Thank you - so Reagan did hold true to his principles, government's role in the economic life of the nation did roll back.

I didn't say that. There were more government workers in larger bureaucracies at the end of Reagan's two terms than at the beginning.

In that, he and Bush will have failed to do what they promised to do.

71 posted on 10/24/2005 9:34:13 AM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson