Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
No, raising taxes is not a conservative principle, bucko.

No it's not, but since Reagan wanted what was in those bills - and there is no line item veto - so he signed them to get the increased the military funds in them to put more pressure on the Soviet Union, I'd say, as a conservative, that Reagan's priorities to undermine the Soviet Union were in keeping with the most sacred conservative principal of all; kill communism.

Bush, OTOH, has grown the government so big, that even a Republican successor will have a hard time not increasing the taxes to pay for George's "Big Government Follies".

You just don't get the lay of the political land, do you? The Bush's and the Kennedy's are the two sides of the same coin. Eastern liberalism.

107 posted on 10/24/2005 1:03:13 PM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: elbucko
Bush, OTOH, has grown the government so big, that even a Republican successor will have a hard time not increasing the taxes to pay for George's "Big Government Follies".

The current year deficit is $313 billion, which is lower, in 2005 dollars, than Clinton's deficit in 1996.

108 posted on 10/24/2005 1:05:56 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson