I notice your comment seems to be the new FR talking point the anti Miers herd is using. I've seen the same or similar on a dozen threads today alone.
The "real arguments" have been made for three weeks and everyone has had their say. These threads are now just baited by shutins who want people to argue with them. (Probably nothing good on cable to look at, most likely.)
So basically, you're saying that you'd rather call the plurality on FR that opposes the Miers nomination "shut-ins" than come up with a positive, substantive reason why such a total blank slate deserves to sit on the highest court in the land?
Well, okay. Your position (whatever that might be) is noted. :)
-Dan