[Flux Capacitor]

----If you think Will is more qualified then Miers to sit on the SCOTUS, there's a bridge in my old home town I'd like to sell ya.----

All right, then, you tell me why a man who has spent decades in print expounding a consistent conservative philosophy on Constitutional principles and judicial powers, is any less qualified than a woman who changes her party affiliation every decade and whose known stances on the Constitution and the role of the judiciary over an entire professional lifetime amount to zero, zip, nada?

-Dan

[HiTech RedNeck]

any less qualified than a woman who changes her party affiliation every decade

So let's see, in 1970 she was a Socialist, in 1960 a Communist,

NOT

[Reagan Man]

For starters and for finishers, Will isn't a lawyer. Miers is a lawyer. Miers was never a judge. Neither was Will.

For someone with over 30 years as a legal professional, a managing partner in a large law firm, head of a state bar association and legal council to the most powerful man in the world, Miers is qualified to sit on the SCOTUS.

As far as I know, Miers changed her party affilliation once. As did Ronald Reagan.

[skr]

What's your source for Harriet Miers' changing political parties every decade?