Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rwfromkansas
Are you seriously saying that a woman who OPPOSED letting gays stick it in other guy's butts, who opposed letting gays have freedom to do what they want in their private time, would also be in support of an extreme liberal view of what rights gays should have?

Pay close attention: there are two issues here

1. Whether you think you should be able to tell consenting adults what they can do in private irrespective of how icky you find their personal behavior.

2. Whether you think society should be forced to accept what most people consider deviant behavior as normal.

So, it is easily possibly to not care if Neal and Roger (pun intended) lock their antique shop for long "lunches" and yet be extremely opposed to an attempt to legislate the acceptance of deviant behavior.

217 posted on 10/23/2005 10:31:27 AM PDT by dfrussell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: dfrussell

There is indeed a difference, which is why it was interesting she said she was opposed to legalizing it, not just that she found it "icky" but they had the right to do it.

The idea that she would then be okay with gay marriage is so....beyond retarted.


234 posted on 10/23/2005 11:22:55 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson