[rwfromkansas]

Again, why do you believe that Miers, WHO OPPOSED LEGALIZING HOMOSEXUAL SEX AT ALL, WOULD SUPPORT LETTING GAYS GET MARRIED?

You keep avoiding the questions, Kent.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Asked and answered, in Postings #175 and #180. Your sad, bogus "point" regarding how gays somehow need special "civil rights" to avoid being "beaten up on the streets" -- a standard DU/Kos talking point, incidentally -- has already been thumped hard, and sent sprawling.

Stop dodging (ineptly), and answer the question: Are you seriously saying that a woman who CHECKED "YES" TO THE QUESTION "ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF CIVIL RIGHTS FOR GAYS AND LESBIANS" could have meant anything BUT marriage and/or adoption rights? What other "civil rights" do you suppose were being code worded here, for pity's sake: the "civil right" to turn somersaults in the town square? The "civil right" to recite the alphabet, backwards?

If you have no intelligent answer to provide -- and, really, that's how the smart money in Vegas is betting, right about now -- toddle off and watch cartoons, or something. Your entire -- well, let's be charitable, shall we, and call it an "argument" -- depends on coughing up something more intellectually substantial than just another online hairball. Get cracking.