This should be such a ridiculously easy task, really. Especially given that the document proving that there was no such endorsement of the positions Farah claims is linked in this very article. It's nothing more than an itinerary for topics to discuss at the conference. How embarrassing for you.
She also told the gay group she didn't want their endorsement in the race for city council. Farah claims that she courted their support. That's called lying.
"
EXAMPLE: stammering, desperately -- as some on this thread have done, in the doomed attempt to score however slight a point as they felt capable of achieving -- that Miers' advocacy for 'civil rights' for gays and lesbians could be plausibly spun (somehow) as meaning something other than marriage and/or adoption rights for same, no matter HOW often repeated, or with what robotic persistence, cannot -- does not -- render it one jot or whit less nonsensical, or more 'true.'"
If you're just going to ignore it, I'm just going to repeat it.