Now think, I know you can.
Do you think if Harriet Miers was for the ICC that she would work for an administration that gutted it and gave the UN the finger over it.
You guys are getting desperate. You use your brains once in a while.
Illogical arguments raised solely for convenience. You folks not only speak out of both sides of your mouths, you do it simultaneously without the slightest indication that you hear the strange dissonance that causes the rest of us laugh at you.
Earlier the Miers fanatics were crowing about how her long and intimate work for the uber-liberal ABA meant nothing, that she was easily capable of working, around, and even leading people she personally disagreed with. Now your tack is, "How can you believe she would work for an administration she doesn't agree with?"
Sure.
Next question.
Do you think if Harriet Miers was for the ICC that she would work for an administration that gutted it and gave the UN the finger over it.