[Republican Wildcat]

The content of the article is false - we have been through this already - I don't know how many times. Again, parroting the same nonsense over and over again does not make it anymore true than the first time it was posted.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Again, parroting the same nonsense over and over again does not make it anymore true

I agree with this statement wholeheartedly.

EXAMPLE: stammering, desperately -- as some on this thread have done, in the doomed attempt to score however slight a point as they felt capable of achieving -- that Miers' advocacy for "civil rights" for gays and lesbians could be plausibly spun (somehow) as meaning something other than marriage and/or adoption rights for same, no matter HOW often repeated, or with what robotic persistence, cannot -- does not -- render it one jot or whit less nonsensical, or more "true."

It'd be nice, really, if everyone were willing to agree that rote repetition of apologist b.s. didn't do anything to make it more "true."

Ah, well. It's an imperfect world, isn't it...?

[dfrussell]

The content of the article is false - we have been through this already

Issue statement that something is a lie. Refer to prior statement to prove that current statement that something is a lie is factual.

How clintonian! :)