Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Hill
Got it? LOL""

You have one of those maniac tendencies to always laugh. There are pills for that - see a doc. Because you shouldn't be laughing when you're displaying ignorance. Neither you nor I know what's in those redacted passages. For you to say that you can mind-read judge Tatel and visualize the redacted pages - that's not funny, that suggests you might need help.

We'll see soon enough what it's all about - if there are indictments. If there aren't, we may never know, since Fitzpatrick might be prohibited from issuing a report.

Either way, consider getting help, bucko.

42 posted on 10/22/2005 8:01:56 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: churchillbuff

I laugh because you are so laughable.

Even you quote the Solon O'Donnell who in turn quotes the judge:

"O'Donnell continues: "Some of us have theorized that the prosecutor may have given up the leak case in favor of a perjury case, but Tatel still refers to it simply as a case “which involves the alleged exposure of a covert agent.”

Er, that's what it is about. An allegation of the exposure of a covert agent.

But you know something the judge doesn't, I guess. LOL


43 posted on 10/22/2005 8:05:16 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson