Replies

I have never alleged any wrong doing, conspiracy or cover-up. However, I have been bewildered by the response to Able Danger – both by the 9-11 Commission and the Pentagon.

Fundamental questions need to be answered –

1. Why was Able Danger a historically insignificant event even thought we knew that Al Qaeda was responsible for o 1993 Bombing on World Trade Center o Khobar Towers o Embassy Bombings in Africa o USS COLE
2. Who ordered the destruction of 2.5 terabytes of data about Al Qaeda and why?
3. Any why wasn’t the customer at SOCOM ever consulted or briefed?
4. Who stopped the meetings between the FBI and Able Danger personnel in September 2000 and why?
5. What was the extent of the 3 hour brief provided to General Shelton in January 2001 regarding Able Danger?
6. Why did the 9/11 Commission change their response several times when queried about Able Danger and attempt to spin Able Danger based on misinformation?
7. Why have threats been made to Able Danger witnesses who were simply telling their stories?

Curt Weldon Bump and Ping.

I have no doubt that there is a vast coverup from both sides of the aisle, as the socialists are deeply entrenched in both parties.

Not so much socialists -- a circle of connections. Maybe the kind of circle the Data-Mining process picks up on. Every circle has its driving forces, the glues that hold it. There is of course, the perennial circle of elite friends in power. But here with Able Danger, there are reports of other circle drivers -- the Chinese undoubtably. The Saudis, certainly.

Money and the where rivers of it spring from.

"I have no doubt that there is a vast coverup from both sides of the aisle, as the socialists are deeply entrenched in both parties."

Socialism is not the reason why the Republicans are participating in the cover-up. clearly, the Bush administration made some mistakes, it is trying to hide here.