Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Earthdweller
[You quoting me] "She defended a lawsuit against the law firm of which she was president, in which unethical and illegal behavior by her firm was alleged, and lost -- or she didn't. (Hint: She did.)"

[You, leading with your chin] Unsubstantiated accusations.

Not really. Get your lawyer or librarian boot Lexis/Nexis and pull up, searching on Miers's law firm and Lomas & Nettleton, a Texas state case decided in IIRC 1995 in the state district court in Texarkana.

The opinion in that case is substantive, not "unsubstantiated", and the allegations of improper conduct with respect to a client's property, and the opinion of the court in granting in part a motion by Lomas's new counsel for summary judgment, add up to specific and substantial accusations borne in and found true.

405 posted on 10/23/2005 7:46:36 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus; Earthdweller
Not really. Get your lawyer or librarian boot Lexis/Nexis and pull up, searching on Miers's law firm and Lomas & Nettleton, a Texas state case decided in IIRC 1995 in the state district court in Texarkana.

There are a couple of cases at the U. Mich site, but from your desctiption of the TX case, I don't believe it appears in that list.

University of Michigan Law Library. Hot Topic: Harriet Miers
In Re Lomas Financial Corporation (95-01235) (Bank. D. DE, 1999)
Zacharjasz v. Lomas and Nettleton Co. (87-4303) (E.D. PA, 1989)

412 posted on 10/23/2005 12:54:12 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson