Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RyanM

"It's not just that Miers was in favor of racial quotas"

To be fair, I think she was arguing the administration's position, just like Robert's did on other issues.

But I'm still against her nomination.


4 posted on 10/22/2005 7:25:56 AM PDT by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fenris6
To be fair, I think she was arguing the administration's position, just like Robert's did on other issues.

Miers is a Quota Queen - this was before her days as White House Counsel, i.e. can't blame it on following the President's agenda.

See post # 29 for relevant WaPo article quote.

 

34 posted on 10/22/2005 7:59:49 AM PDT by peyton randolph (Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Fenris6; Dan from Michigan; SunkenCiv; Stellar Dendrite; AntiGuv; flashbunny; AndyJackson; ...
It was the other way around.

Bush's-or at the very least, Cheney's-inclination was to support both Gratz and Grutter, i.e. oppose preferential treatment in both the U. of Michigan's law school and its undergraduate program.

It was Gonzales-and to a lesser extent, Miers-who significantly softened the administration's original stance, allowing Justice O'Connor to issue a Solomon-like-well, Bakke-like-decision, which preserved the inherently discriminatory practice of setting aside a certain percentage of seats for underperforming minority applicants.

143 posted on 10/22/2005 5:19:57 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson